About this Entry
Posted by: dafrabbit

Visit dafrabbit's Xanga Site

Original: 1/10/2007 9:50 PM
Views: 7
Comments: 4
eProps: 6

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
purpleidears
Tamalamadingdong
AzNJASONAzN

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Presidential Address On Iraq: "A New Plan Forward"

 Just finished watching President Bush's address to the nation on his new plan for Iraq. For those who missed it, the transcript is on ABC here.

In a rather short, 20 minute address, the President apologized and took the blame for the deterioration of Iraq and the US missteps which led to the current Iraq of sectarian (some would call it civil) war. He outlined a new plan, calling for the deployment of approximately 21,500 new US troops to Iraq, embedding more US advisors in Iraqi units, and essentially establishing the security of Baghdad as paramount. In addition, he stressed the need for "patience, sacrifice and resolve", and set an optimistic yet guarded hope for the coming year. He also reinforced the belief that the US must succeed in Iraq for not only the Iraqis' sake, but for the security of the entire region, and perhaps even the entire world itself. He established a conciliatory stance, welcoming criticism and suggestions, as well as reinforcing the validity of his plan with statements of consulting with not only Congress, but the Iraq Study Group on the issue. Finally, he outlined the need for the Iraqi government to take on greater responsibility, namely in reconstruction efforts (the Iraqi government has pledged $10B USD).

In my opinion, the President should be given credit for first of all apologizing publicly for his mistakes, taking the blame for the entire Iraqi conflict is a hard pill to swallow, especially when in all honesty, it is hard to blame the situation in Iraq on any one single person. In addition, the President should be commended for his new found willingness for bipartisanship and criticism, although how earnestly he applies this new attitude is still up in the air. His plan, of handing over greater security responsibilities to the Iraqi forces is, I believe, a sound one, and does pose significant deviations from current operations. Namely, the desire now to actually hold pacified areas holds merit, as this was the single greatest drawback of US/Iraqi military policy. In general, he makes a sound, clear statement of the need for perseverance and steadfast dedication to the rebuilding and fixing of Iraq. For it is his belief, and mine as well, that America cannot fail in Iraq.

Unfortunately, I must fault President Bush for his ever present "Good vs. Evil" imagery, in particular, his colorful statement, "the terrorists and insurgents...are without conscience, and will make the year ahead bloody and violent." His statements force all terrorists into an extreme corner, where they have nowhere to back down to, and MUST use violence. The President, along with the rest of the world, needs to make it clear that terrorism, while not tolerated, CAN be reformed. That is to say, terrorists, if they lay down their violent ways, will be welcome to join society and share their opinions on issues in a global forum. I believe not all terrorists are without conscience, some undoubtedly are, but most are simply normal human beings, desperate for a voice in the world. The true solution to terrorism is not their extermination, for by doing so we risk eliminating the freedom for people to voice their views. Instead, we must seek to find ways to allow terrorists a place in society, to slowly wean them away from their violent ways, to create a forum for them to present their grievances. I believe, especially with the global connectivity of the Internet, we, the entire Human Race have the power to do something we were never able to do before: provide a global forum open to everyone, from the youngest, poorest child in a Third World Country, to the most affluent senior citizens of our world. Throughout our childhood, we learned to listen to each other, and not to simply call each other names...why is the real world any different?

 Posted 1/10/2007 9:50 PM - 7 Views - 6 eProps - 4 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

4 Comments

Visit purpleidears's Xanga Site!
Ok, Mr. Freddie...here are my comments to your comments:

Gracias for the outline of the speech. I'm sure many missed it...(I missed the very surprising statement of Bush's admittance of mistakes) so it was very helpful.

I would like to comment on your "reinforcing the validity of his plan with statements of consulting with not only Congress, but the Iraq Study Group on the issue." statement though.

First of all, as far as I've heard so far, the now majority Democratic party in Congress for the most part is against this surge. Yes, he has "consulted" with Congress...but I don't see how this is a bipartisan action (or how his other actions have been bipartisan too).

His mention about the Iraq Study Group is like...just a side mention, a little jeer that says "so you think you know better than the president of the US." The Study Group was a bipartisan group, people chosen for their realist, multilateral approach. As summarized by someone on NPR whose name I can't remember but fully agree with, the Study Group's main points were completely ignored. That of 1) the absolute need for a "diplomatic surge" she called it - to reengage diplomatically - not just militarily in the region. Talking with (and not treating like naughty little children) Iran and Syria. and 2) The gradual withdrawal of troops - not defeatedly, but after working with the Iraqi government so that a timeline is set for the Iraqis to start taking over and controlling their own country themselves. Needless to say, President Bush's plan is the exact opposite of both of those suggestions.

As the same speaker said earlier, President Bush's plan seems basically, "stay the course- plus 21,500 troops."

One has to wonder...
Posted 1/10/2007 10:41 PM by purpleidears - reply

Visit dafrabbit's Xanga Site!
hahaha....sigh. well yes. the greatest problem with his planning and mindset is his "good vs. evil" thinking. it's useless overhead that this administration needs to shed, because the fact of the matter is that we can't afford another conflict right now, and most likely not one for another decade or more after we get out of iraq. so his rhetoric against syria and iran is not only not helpful, but is most likely harming the process.

as for his bipartisan efforts well, i can't really comment on that aside from that he did mention them...i'm not quite up to date on that at the moment.

and finally...the study group's recommendation of supplying US troops to Iraq on a performance based plan is brilliant business sense....but it's a little...eh. what if iraq falls through? then we stop supplying US troops, basically pull out?

while i think certainly, there are points of the president's plan that need working on....but i think in general he should be commended for turning around and taking the blame very publicly and very explicitly. the number of politicians who have ever done that this late in their terms can probably be counted on one hand. it's the right thing to do, now we just need to watch and see if he follows through.
Posted 1/10/2007 10:48 PM by dafrabbit - reply

Visit Tamalamadingdong's Xanga Site!
i was just wondering if you're a MoveOn member? they say he wants to send in more troops even when "In a recent poll, only 11% of the public supports sending more troops to Iraq". i know it's not fully up to him but imo, not wise.
Posted 1/12/2007 12:50 AM by Tamalamadingdong - reply

Visit AzNJASONAzN's Xanga Site!
credit for apologizing publicly? hah
should have been done *YEARS* ago
...i mean, sure, credit for finally realizing
that iraq has been so obviously a
BLATANT mistake since...the very beginning

if the bush administration had not buried
its head in the sand, the apology would have
come out much much sooner,
and the hole would not have been
dug any deeper over the years
now there are so many troops over there,
so many lives disrupted, and for what?
its not fair to say that troops died in vain,
but their services could have been utilized
*MUCH* more effectively in other operational
theaters around the world

i have absolutely no respect for bush,
its like the NYPD beating up on minority
suspects until they finally confess
...its not a heartfelt expression
when youve been backed up against a corner
and have no other option
(granted, bush *could* have just kept on
denying that anything was wrong,
but thats just bordering on mildly retarded)
a simple apology will not cut it,
not as long as bush continues to make
idiodic and irrational decisions
Posted 1/12/2007 12:15 PM by AzNJASONAzN - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 


Back to dafrabbit's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in dafrabbit's local time zone:
GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)